Imports to Israel are subject to a wharfage fee of 1.02% of their c.i.f. value and exports to a wharfage fee of 0.2% of the f.o.b value.
Imports, according to the ports' tariff system, are subsidizing exports for the use of ports. In addition, the fees do not appear to reflect the real costs of the service, as they are only linked to the value of the traded goods.
Lynn noted that the ports' ad-valorem charging system contradicts the GATT agreement which calls upon members states to reduce import barriers such as port levies.
Lynn called upon the Minister to set up a committee to study and recommend a new alternative charging system which will be based on the weight of the cargo and which will reflect the true costs of providing port services.
Lynn added that the present system heavily discriminates imports by charging imported cargo with higher port fees compared to exports. This, according to Lynn, opposes the present government economic policy which does not allow the discrimination of one sector in favour of another.
Lynn criticized maritime ports' wharfage fees system
Uriel Lynn, president of the Federation of Israeli Chambers of Commerce addressed last week a letter to Mr. Shaul Mofaz, Israeli Transport Minister, criticizing the port's wharfage fees system
00:00 ,16.10.2006
-
Found it useful? Share
-
Share on Facebook
-
Share on X
-
Share on LinkedIn
-
Share via Email
-
Share on WhatsApp
-
Print Article
Related
Recycling in 2005 was 23% of all refuse

OECD- Israel places seventh for growth compared to 30 of the organization members

Imports of electrical goods in September down, compared to last year's parallel period

Euro 4 emission limits to be applied to all diesel vehicles imported to Israel

"Transclal Trade" begins a year of community involvement

Orian celebrated the merged Schenker and BAX Global operations